Civil War, what is it good for? (CREDIT: Murray Close/A24)
Starring: Kirsten Dunst, Wagner Moura, Cailee Spaeny, Stephen McKinley Henderson, Nick Offerman, Jesse Plemons
Director: Alex Garland
Running Time: 109 Minutes
Rating: R for Gunfire, Grenades, and Piles of Dead Bodies
Release Date: April 12, 2024 (Theaters)
What’s It About?: The president of the United States refuses to relinquish power in the face of incoming secessionary forces. Meanwhile, a group of journalists sniffs out an opportunity, as they’re going to barge right into the White House for an interview. Nobody outside of the commander-in-chief’s inner circle has talked to him in who knows how long. But they’re warned that it’s essentially a suicide mission. The administration considers the press an enemy of the people, and the area in and around Washington, D.C. is the deadliest part of the country, or what’s left of it. Nevertheless, they feel compelled to make the trip, out of a sense of duty, or ambition, or steely commitment to the truth, or some combination of the above.
What Made an Impression?: Thought Number One: The fact that Civil War takes place in a near-future United States is kind of beside the point. The landscape matters in a logistical sense, but the underlying principles would remain the same no matter what the setting or how much it is or isn’t based in reality. Fundamentally, this movie is a dramatized how-to guide for how to be a wartime photojournalist. As veteran photog Lee (Kirsten Dunst), her colleague Joel (Wagner Moura), ambitious youngster Jessie (Cailee Spaeny), and Lee and Joel’s mentor Sammy (Stephen McKinley Henderson) embed themselves in combat zones, they’re just as vulnerable to bullets and bombs as any soldier or civilian. The big block “PRESS” letters on their vests and van are supposed to relay a message of objective neutrality, one that most (but not all) of the combatants respect.
Thought Number Two: Any viewer expecting Civil War to be a specific warning about the current state of affairs in the United States will likely end up disappointed. This country may be more polarized than it’s been in decades, but the exact nature of that polarization is not exactly reflected in writer/director Alex Garland’s vision. This is simply an alternate possibility of what that division could look like, one that Garland thoroughly declines to offer any explanation for. Even the president (Nick Offerman) remains nameless! Once I accepted that Civil War was going to be light on backstory, I could appreciate its cinéma vérité qualities. Still, I was frustrated by the impenetrable characterization of the people that we do get to know. Although, that was perhaps by design, as Lee and Joel have been hardened by the lesson that they must subsume themselves within their jobs. Weirdly enough, that loss of personality is enough to remind me of how urgent it is to avoid any actual civil war.
Civil War is Recommended If You Like: Primary (1960), Abandoned highway cinematography, Ominous road trips
Grade: 3.5 out of 5 Alliances
Jmunney's Blog 