‘The Love Hypothesis’ is a Mostly Predictable and Mostly Sweet Rom-Com

Leave a comment

My hypothesis is that plenty of people will watch this movie (CREDIT: Prime Video/Screenshot)

Starring: Lili Reinhart, Tom Bateman, Rachel Marsh, Jaboukie Young-White, Nicholas Duvernay, Arty Froushan

Director: Claire Scanlon

Running Time: 110 Minutes

Rating: R for A Notable Deficit of Shyness in the Bedroom

Release Date: September 23, 2026 (Amazon Prime Video)

What’s It About?: It’s hard to think straight in an academic setting. Olive Smith (Lili Reinhart) can certainly attest to that. She’s a biology PhD candidate at Stanford who cares about two things above all else: finding a cure for pancreatic cancer, and her best friend Anh (Rachel Marsh). Regarding the latter, she attempts to convince Anh that she’s over their mutual crush Jeremy (Nicholas Duvernay) by impulsively kissing a random guy in a hallway. Unfortunately, that random guy turns out to be Dr. Adam Carlsen (Tom Bateman), the professor with the most hardass reputation in their department. But somehow, he’s actually willing to enter into a mutually beneficial arrangement with Olive: they’ll pretend to date each other so that her friends can date without feeling guilty and so that Stanford can be convinced that he’s sufficiently committed to his current location for them to release his research funds. Olive might think that she’s objective enough not to catch feelings, but it can get a little slippery when you’re your own test subject.

What Made an Impression?: Getting to the Revelations: The Love Hypothesis is based on Ali Hazelwood’s beloved 2021 novel of the same name, which I bought and devoured just a couple weeks before the movie’s release. When I’m reviewing a movie that’s an adaptation, I don’t always (or often) focus on its fidelity or deviation from the source material. But in this case, it’s the perfect opportunity to do so. With that in mind, I’ll highlight that there’s a major revelation that’s treated as a climactic moment at the end of the book, but in the movie, it’s treated as a more casual revelation as the first act transitions to the second. And honestly, I think it makes sense to reposition in that way. It was kind of drawn out on the page, and it’s ultimately not the biggest deal in Olive and Adam’s journey (though it is meaningful in its own way).
Adaptational Flexibility: To quickly sum up the rest of the changes from page to screen: a few supporting players are dropped, some conflicts are compressed, and certain moments of character development are subtly but significantly shifted. These alterations will certainly stick out if you’ve read (or re-read) the novel as close to watching as I have, but none of them fundamentally change what this movie is all about. Instead, they feel like alternative scenarios that Hazelwood herself very could have considered when writing the book. Think of them as shifting puzzle pieces instead of chemical reactions resulting in a new substance.
The Passion Can’t Be Denied: There’s an effort to characterize Olive as a demisexual, a fairly new term used to refer to people who can only experience sexual attraction upon developing a strong emotional bond with someone. It’s a little bluntly stated in the screen version, though we certainly do see that bond being formed. The moment of consummation is a lot more intense than you might expect from something with such a frothy premise and color palette. I don’t know how much Lili Reinhart was focusing on the demisexuality of it all while calibrating her performance, but she and Bateman certainly forged the requisite connection.
Looking for Meaning in a Meaningless World: During a sequence at a campus picnic, there’s a random shot of an extra chowing down on some food. I don’t know if the editor was having a bit of fun, or if that was just more or less unintentional. But either way, it made an impression on me.
Shrinking: With the built-in audience that a beloved book provides, one would think that The Love Hypothesis would be a slam dunk proposition as a theatrical release instead of the straight-to-streaming arrival it’s been fated to. Perhaps that lack of immersion is why some of the scenes that should have had my heart singing at full volume instead fell a little flat. Thus, I must recommend that any of you who are planning to watch must do your best to recreate the theatrical experience at home. So invite a whole bunch of friends, project it on the wall, set up a full-service concession stand – whatever you can manage! And then hopefully we’ll have some more evidence regarding my hypothesis that all movies should be released in theaters.

The Love Hypothesis is Recommended If You Like: AO3

Grade: 3 out of 5 Observations

‘Hedda’ Review: DaCosta and Thompson Offer Up Their Own Spin on Ibsen

Leave a comment

A still of 3 women in a movie called Hedda (CREDIT: Parisa Taghizadeh/Amazon Content Services LLC)

Starring: Tessa Thompson, Imogen Poots, Nina Hoss, Tom Bateman, Nicholas Pinnock, Finbar Lynch, Mirren Mack, Jamael Westman, Saffron Hocking, Kathryn Hunter

Director: Nia DaCosta

Running Time: 107 Minutes

Rating: R for The Typical Party Vices, Including a Little Bit of Skin

Release Date: October 22, 2025 (Select Theaters)/October 29, 2025 (Amazon Prime Video)

What’s It About?: By all outward appearances, Hedda Gabler (Tessa Thompson) seems to have a pretty charmed life. She’s got a decent husband (Tom Bateman), she lives in a massive house,  and she gets to host some wild shindigs. But there’s a powder keg just waiting to be lit. And it all goes kaboom over the course of one of those bacchanals. That’s because on that night, a couple of ladies with their own agendas (Nina Hoss and Imogen Poots) return to force Hedda to reap what she’s been sowing. And so, forbidden romance, professional jealousies, and general pettiness all converge for a deadly disaster that none of the guests will soon forget.

What Made an Impression?: The Scandinavia of It All: 2025’s Hedda is just the latest in a long line of adaptations of the 1891 Henrik Ibsen play Hedda Gabler. Before watching this version, I only knew it by name and was totally unfamiliar with the plot. But I have encountered Ibsen’s most famous work (A Doll’s House), so I had some idea of what he’s all about. Writer-director Nia DaCosta has fully queered up the story, although I wouldn’t have been surprised if that element were already present in the original. Which is to say, it’s a natural fit.
We’re All Trapped: If I had to select one word to sum up Hedda, it would be … “claustrophobic.” There’s no escaping this party! Or maybe there is, though it would probably require these characters to totally redefine their perspectives of their current life situations. As the viewer, I felt similarly boxed in. If you find yourself in the same boat as me, you could always walk out of the theater or press stop on your remote. That is, unless you relish anxiety-inducing moviegoing experiences.
She’s So Petty: Tessa Thompson is a pretty dang great actor, and Hedda only reinforces that truth. But her version of the titular scamp (and perhaps most versions) is not a very pleasant person to be around. In fact, I would even go so far as to call her a sociopath. Maybe if I had prepared myself a bit more before going to know what I would be getting into, I might have been entertained by all of her manipulative behavior. But only to a point. Ultimately, this is one of those movies that I found kind of middling, even though I got the sense that the people making it probably did exactly what they wanted to do.

Hedda is Recommended If You Like: Hot messes throughout the decade

Grade: 2.5 out of 5 Secrets

Movie Review: ‘Cold Pursuit’ Brings Liam Neeson’s Revenge Shenanigans to the Rocky Mountains

Leave a comment

CREDIT: Doane Gregory

Starring: Liam Neeson, Tom Bateman, Emmy Rossum, William Forsythe, Julia Jones, Domenick Lombardozzi, Raoul Trujillo, Benjamin Hollingsworth, John Doman, Aleks Paunovic, Christopher Logan, Nathaniel Arcand, Ben Cotton, Tom Jackson, Mitchell Saddleback, Laura Dern

Director: Hans Petter Moland

Running Time: 118 Minutes

Rating: R for Drug Content, Angry Man Profanity, and Truly Wild Death Scenes

Release Date: February 8, 2019

Cold Pursuit appears to take place in a scenario where the souls of everyone involved have disappeared. That makes sense, because stripping away all of your morality is just about necessary to make working for a drug cartel or going on a reign of vengeance bearable to one’s psyche. This is perhaps the bleakest of any Liam Neeson actioner, but that darkness is alleviated by the fact that it is also the most offbeat. Neeson plays Nels Coxman, a snowplow driver in a Rocky Mountain resort town. He’s just been named Citizen of the Year, but now he has ventured out to kill every member of a notorious cartel who have killed his son. His wife (Laura Dern) leaves him as soon as she realizes what he is up to, but we stick with him, not because the revenge tastes so sweet (it doesn’t, or at least it isn’t designed to), but because the killings all go down in such deadpan fashion. That tends to happen in such a harsh and unforgiving climate and terrain as this one.

Nels’ primary adversary is the drug lord Viking (Tom Bateman), who is the breed of testosterone in a suit who tells his son that “all the answers” he’ll need to in life are in Lord of the Flies. His performance is just the right mix of hammy and deranged to make Cold Pursuit palatable. Without him or the whole film’s gallows humor ethos, this would be the type of movie to make me despair about the end of civilization. In a battle between the soulless, style is essential for the audience’s sustenance, and director Hans Petter Moland has style like you could never imagine. It also helps that there are some flashes of thriving humanity, in the form of a love story for one of the cartel members as well as a dogged detective played by Emmy Rossum. But for the most part, this is “No Country for Those with Love in Their Hearts.”

Cold Pursuit is Recommended If You Like: Taken, Fargo, Scandinavian Humor

Grade: 3.5 out of 5 Tree Impalements