‘Michael’ Skips the Controversy as It Charts the Rise of a Singular Pop Star

Leave a comment

And Shamone to you too (PHOTO CREDIT: Glen Wilson)

Starring: Jaafar Jackson, Colman Domingo, Nia Long, Juliano Krue Valdi, Laura Harrier, Miles Teller, KeiLyn Durrel Jones, Jamal R. Henderson, Tre Horton, Rhyan Hill, Joseph David-Jones, Jessica Sula

Director: Antoine Fuqua

Running Time: 118 Minutes

Rating: PG-13 for Mild Language and A Troublesome Father-Son Relationship

Release Date: April 24, 2026 (Theaters)

What’s It About?: In the late 1960s, the Jackson 5 were on the verge of emerging from the supposed nowheresville Gary, Indiana into the most rarefied echelons of music superstardom. The biopic Michael starts at this inflection point, with youngest Jackson brother Michael (played as a boy by Juliano Krue Valdi) as the undeniable, precocious phenomenon. It then jumps ahead about ten years (with Jaafar Jackson taking over the title role), as Michael ventures forth into what would almost immediately prove to be one of the most successful solo musical careers of all time. Through it all, he attempts to escape the grasp of his overbearing father manager Joe (thoroughly embodied by Colman Domingo) and live to the fullest the eccentrically creative life that the rest of the world could never fully understand.

What Made an Impression?: What Do We Do with the Rest?: Michael keeps its focus limited to about a 20-year window, a style of compression that is generally a sensible idea for biopics. (Although an even shorter timeframe might have been advisable.) But in the case of Michael Jackson, this decision cannot help but amplify what is left out, namely: the bizarre lifestyle choices that made him the subject of ridicule, the allegations that he was a perpetrator of child sexual abuse, and the controversies surrounding his untimely death. The darkness isn’t completely hidden, but nothing ever emerges in this telling that would make Michael anything other than an angel on Earth. Now, is there even a way to make a movie about him that thoughtfully examines both the positives and negatives of his legacy? I’m not sure, and I don’t know if anyone is even asking for that anyway. But even if it makes sense from a storytelling perspective to leave off certain elements of a subject’s life, you can’t change what’s already come to light.
Moonwalking Down the Middle: If you can personally get past the most discomfiting aspects of Jackson’s legacy (or hold opposing viewpoints in your head simultaneously), does Michael offer significant enough entertainment value to be worthwhile? Well, Jaafar Jackson (one of Michael’s real-life nephews) does deliver a remarkable simulacrum of his uncle’s entire being. It’s impressive, and also a little uncanny. Besides that, though, there’s not a whole lot here that’ll likely blow anyone away. Screenwriter John Logan and director Antoine Fuqua pretty much deliver all the typical biopic beats that’ll make you go, “Yeah, I thought you’d do that.” MJ’s story is compelling enough that a few exciting sequences are inevitable, but overall this is nothing to shout “Shamone!” about.
Familiar Faces?: So my general reaction to Michael was pretty dang similar to that of the thoroughly whelming Queen biopic Bohemian Rhapsody, all the way down to a cameo from a certain fellow that made me go, “Hey wait a minute, that’s … What’s he doing here?!” (I’ll protect the surprise, but you can easily look up who I’m referring to if you can’t wait to find out.) It’s a little slice of perfection in an otherwise mostly flavor-free concoction. There’s a similar moment when a certain comedian of note plays a certain sports promoter of note. I have no idea if the real versions of those moments actually played out like they do here, but I’m not demanding verisimilitude in those instances.

Michael is Recommended If You: Just want to see someone do a really good impression of his famous family member

Grade: 2 out of 5 Shamones

‘Missing’ Delivers Yet Another Screenlife Winner

1 Comment

Not Pictured: The People Who Are Missing (CREDIT: Screen Gems)

Starring: Storm Reid, Nia Long, Ken Leung, Joaquim de Almeida, Amy Landecker, Daniel Henney, Tim Griffin, Megan Suri

Directors: Nick Johnson and Will Merrick

Running Time: 111 Minutes

Rating: PG-13 for Over-the-Top Ragers and Implied Disturbing Violence

Release Date: January 20, 2023 (Theaters)

What’s It About?: 18-year-old June Allen (Storm Reid) sure is ready to make her way to college so that she doesn’t have to keep constantly rolling her eyes at her mom Grace (Nia Long). She’ll get to preview that independence for about a week as Mom goes on vacation to Colombia with her new boyfriend Kevin (Ken Leung, aka Miles from Lost). She proceeds to throw a nonstop, knockout rager but ultimately manages to schlep it over to LAX just in time to pick up Grace and Kevin upon their return back to the States. But then they’re nowhere to be found!

So to track them down, June enlists the help of an FBI agent (Daniel Henney), her mom’s lawyer (Amy Landecker), and a random guy on the ground in Colombia (Joaquim de Almeida). Over the course of the investigation, some rather surprising tidbits about Grace and Kevin’s pasts begin to emerge, and we see this all unfold on laptops, cell phones, and other modern Internet-connected screen devices.

What Made an Impression?: Is screenlife the best genre ever?!!! It’s a fairly young cinematic style, but it’s been producing hit after hit after hit. Unfriended was excellent! Unfriended: Dark Web took the scares to another level! Searching delivered the thrills in spades! And now we’ve got Missing serving as a standalone sequel to Searching, with a fresh story that maintains the same investigative approach and also the same gerund titling strategy. Neither Missing nor Searching has a plot that absolutely demands confining its action to screens, but that approach nevertheless keeps everything focused. And I think that’s a huge reason (perhaps even the hugest reason) why this subgenre has delivered so consistently. There are some cheats here and there in which the action spreads beyond the computer, but for the most part, the creative restraints fuel creative triumphs.

The undeniable fun of Missing is derived from its series of status quo-altering revelations, each one more gobsmacking than the rest. Pretty much everyone connected to the disappearance has their devastating secrets, and each one is calibrated for maximum audience satisfaction. I wonder if everything would still hang together on a repeat viewing, but even if the strings do start to show, that doesn’t change how effective the initial delivery is. This is a fine-tuned, well-oiled puzzle. You might be able to see greasy residue on some of the pieces, but that’s only evidence of all the essential attention to detail.

Missing is Recommended If You Like: Searching, Cable true crime docs, Online how-to guides

Grade: 4 out of 5 Windows